Weak Condorcet

Violation of Independence of Pareto-Dominated Alternatives

Profile type: ProfileWithTies
Config: 4 c, 3 v
Parameters: ∅

IPDA violation for Weak Condorcet.
0 is Pareto-dominated by another candidate and removing 0 changes the set of winners:
+-----+-----+---+
|  1  |  1  | 1 |
+-----+-----+---+
|  1  |  2  | 3 |
| 0 3 |  1  | 2 |
|  2  | 0 3 | 1 |
|     |     | 0 |
+-----+-----+---+
ProfileWithTies([{2: 2, 0: 1, 3: 1, 1: 0}, {0: 2, 3: 2, 1: 1, 2: 0}, {0: 3, 1: 2, 2: 1, 3: 0}], rcounts=[1, 1, 1], cmap={0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3})
Winners in full election: [0, 1, 2, 3]
Winners in election without 0: [1, 2, 3]