Superior Voting

Violation of Independence of Pareto-Dominated Alternatives

Profile type: Profile
Config: 5 c, 3 v
Parameters: ∅

IPDA violation for Superior Voting.
0 is Pareto-dominated by another candidate and removing 0 changes the set of winners:
+---+---+---+
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
+---+---+---+
| 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3 | 4 | 2 |
+---+---+---+
Profile([[2, 4, 1, 0, 3], [3, 1, 0, 2, 4], [4, 1, 0, 3, 2]], rcounts=[1, 1, 1], cmap={0: '0', 1: '1', 2: '2', 3: '3', 4: '4'})
Winners in full election: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Winners in election without 0: [1, 2, 3, 4]